Theoutnet uses Responsys as their primary email service provider. They rank #34,161 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. We've also observed sends via Ometria. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 6 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to Red Sift OnDMARC. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 1 observed email use a return-path aligned with theoutnet.com (emailom.news.theoutnet.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 23 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with theoutnet.com (email.theoutnet.com, news.theoutnet.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
VMC issued by: digicert.
TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 13 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 3 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
Ometria 1ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.
Probed: theoutnet.com, emailom.news.theoutnet.com, email.theoutnet.com, news.theoutnet.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 5 | 26.3% |
| promotions | 14 | 73.7% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsys | 18 | 22.2% | 77.8% | 0.0% | |
| Ometria | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses theoutnet.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.