Numan uses Customer.io as their primary email service provider. They rank #224,872 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. We've also observed sends via Brevo. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100). We've recorded 1 ESP change since first observing this brand.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 5 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to numan.com. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 19 observed emails use a return-path aligned with numan.com (cioeu98565.numan.com, outbound.intercom.numan.com, sibmail.numan.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 19 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with numan.com (cioeu98565.numan.com, numan.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 0% TLS 1.3, 100% TLS 1.2 (across 7 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 2 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
Intercom 5 Brevo 2ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: numan.com, outbound.intercom.numan.com, sibmail.numan.com, cioeu98565.numan.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 18 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brevo | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Customer.io | 11 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Intercom | 5 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses numan.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
numan.com | Customer.io 12 Intercom 5 Brevo 2 |