Zara uses Responsys for marketing email and Mailjet for transactional/notifications. They rank #3,398 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
DMARC reports sent to proofpoint.com. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 2 observed emails use a return-path aligned with zara.com (bnc3.zara.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 13 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with zara.com (news.zara.com, zara.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
VMC issued by: digicert.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: zara.com, bnc3.zara.com, news.zara.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 14 | 93.3% |
| promotions | 1 | 6.7% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsys | 13 | 92.3% | 7.7% | 0.0% | |
| Mailjet | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses zara.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 129.145.70.150 | omp.news.zara.com |
13 | Check → |
| 185.189.238.45 | o45.p27.mailjet.com |
1 | Check → |
| 185.189.238.48 | o48.p27.mailjet.com |
1 | Check → |
Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.