Wix uses Wix for marketing email and SendGrid for transactional/notifications. They rank #557 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. We've also observed sends via 2 other providers: Braze, Responsys. Email goes out from 9 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 95/100). We've recorded 3 ESP changes since first observing this brand.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 8 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to vali.email. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: 95% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (sg.pb05.wixemails.com, sg.notification.wix.com, bounces.wixemails.com); the rest use third-party paths (smtp.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 21 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with wix.com (pb05.wixemails.com, notification.wix.com, notifications.wix.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
VMC issued by: valimail.
TLS: 70% TLS 1.3, 30% TLS 1.2 (across 10 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 6 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
Braze 8 Responsys 6ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: wix.com, sg.pb05.wixemails.com, bounces.wixemails.com, sg.notification.wix.com, sg.pb03.wixemails.com, em6359.ascend.wix.com, smtp.com, sg.pb06.wixemails.com, pb03.wixemails.com, notification.wix.com, pb06.wixemails.com, team.wix.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 29 | 76.3% |
| promotions | 9 | 23.7% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SendGrid | 7 | 42.9% | 57.1% | 0.0% | |
| Wix | 11 | 81.8% | 18.2% | 0.0% | |
| Responsys | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Braze | 5 | 80.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses wix.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 137.22.233.79 | copj1fn9.team.wix.com |
7 | 1 | Check → |
| 129.145.67.225 | omptrans.emails.wix.com |
6 | 3 | Check → |
| 192.174.81.204 | mta-174-81-204.wix-shared.com.sparkpostmail.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.66.171 | o32.sg.ascendbywix.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 168.245.75.90 | xvfrqbrx.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
3 | — | Check → |
| 147.253.213.98 | mta-253-213-98.wix-shared.com.sparkpostmail.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 137.22.239.199 | at8mamtj.team.wix.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.85.83 | o18.cm-shared.wixnotifications.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.61.16 | o27.sg.ascendbywix.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |