Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Webflow

webflow.com
🏆Rank #2,846 🏷 SaaS 🇺🇸United States 📥 Inbox 76%

Webflow uses Iterable for marketing email and SendGrid for transactional/notifications. They rank #2,846 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. We've also observed sends via 3 other providers: Postmark, Marketo, SparkPost. Email goes out from 3 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).

Marketing ESPIterable
Transactional ESPSendGrid
Total observations26
Active days14
Avg per active day1.9
Last activity📬 Active · yesterday
Cadence~weekly
Compare Webflow with another brand:

Email setup 85/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
85/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 10/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 3 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to DMARC Digests. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 11 observed emails use a return-path aligned with webflow.com (bounce.webflow.com, pm-bounces.webflow.com, mkt.webflow.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: 47% of observed emails sign with an aligned DKIM key (hello.webflow.com, webflow.com, contact.webflow.com); the rest sign with third-party keys (zendesk.com) where DMARC has to rely on SPF alignment.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: modern — 83% TLS 1.3 (across 12 sends).

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

Zendesk 10 Postmark 4 Marketo 2 SparkPost 1

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Marketo ✓ confirmed Postmark ✓ confirmed SparkPost ✓ confirmed Iterable ✓ via SparkPost Zendesk ✓ via sending IP SendGrid observed

"Observed" pills mean we detected emails from these ESPs, but they don't appear in any SPF record we probed. They may still be properly authorized — sending infrastructure can live on subdomains we haven't seen yet, or use IP-listing instead of include: directives.

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Adobe Campaign Google Workspace Mailgun Mailjet Salesforce MC

Probed: webflow.com, bounce.webflow.com, pm-bounces.webflow.com, mkt.webflow.com, hello.webflow.com, contact.webflow.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 16 76.2%
promotions 5 23.8%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Marketo 2
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Iterable 4
50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
SparkPost 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Postmark 4
75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
Zendesk 8
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Apr 23 – Jun 29, 2026 · 12 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

6 0 SendGrid: 1 (2026-04-23)1Iterable: 1 (2026-05-04)1Iterable: 1 (2026-05-13)SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-13)2Iterable: 2 (2026-05-26)2Postmark: 2 (2026-05-28)2Zendesk: 1 (2026-06-02)Marketo: 1 (2026-06-02)2Zendesk: 1 (2026-06-03)1Zendesk: 2 (2026-06-06)2Postmark: 1 (2026-06-09)1Zendesk: 6 (2026-06-11)6Iterable: 1 (2026-06-22)Postmark: 1 (2026-06-22)2Marketo: 1 (2026-06-29)104/2304/3005/0705/1405/2105/2806/0406/1106/1806/2506/29
Zendesk Iterable SendGrid Postmark Marketo SparkPost

Similar brands using Iterable

Sending IPs

IP addresses webflow.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
192.174.86.165 mta-86-165.sparkpostmail.com 4 1 Check →
192.161.149.2 mta-out2.pod19.use1.zdsys.com 3 Check →
156.70.24.122 mta-70-24-122.sparkpostmail.com 2 Check →
50.31.156.116 sc-ord-mta116.mtasv.net 2 Check →
192.28.145.46 mkt.webflow.com 2 1 Check →
192.161.149.10 mta-out10.pod19.use1.zdsys.com 2 Check →
192.161.149.12 mta-out12.pod19.use1.zdsys.com 2 Check →
192.161.149.15 mta-out15.pod19.use1.zdsys.com 2 Check →
192.161.149.9 mta-out9.pod19.use1.zdsys.com 1 Check →
50.31.156.117 sc-ord-mta117.mtasv.net 1 Check →
50.31.205.207 mta207-ab1.mtasv.net 1 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
webflow.comZendesk 10 SendGrid 4 Postmark 4
hello.webflow.comIterable 5 SparkPost 1
contact.webflow.comMarketo 2