Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Tlt Translations

tlt-translations.com

Tlt Translations uses Strato as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 70/100). Missing: SPF, one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPStrato
Total observations9
Active days2
Avg per active day4.5
Last activity💤 Dormant · 4 weeks ago
Cadence~every 2 weeks
Compare Tlt Translations with another brand:

Email setup 70/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
70/100
SPF
none
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 1/10
Authentication

DKIM alignment: all 5 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with tlt-translations.com (tlt-translations.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Strato ✓ via sending IP

SPF authorizations

No SPF record published on the apex tlt-translations.com. Emails from this brand still pass SPF — most ESPs handle SPF on a sending subdomain (Return-Path) rather than the apex. Adding an apex SPF (even v=spf1 -all) would block direct spoofing of unused From: addresses.

Probed: tlt-translations.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 9 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Strato 5
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 3 – May 30, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

5 0 Strato: 4 (2026-05-03)4Strato: 5 (2026-05-30)505/0305/0605/0905/1205/1505/1805/2105/2405/2705/30
Strato

Similar brands using Strato

Sending IPs

IP addresses tlt-translations.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
81.169.146.220 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de 5 Check →
81.169.146.216 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de 3 Check →
81.169.146.219 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
tlt-translations.comStrato 9