Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Fenjaengelhardt

fenjaengelhardt.de
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Professional Services 🇩🇪Germany

Fenjaengelhardt uses Strato as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 70/100). Missing: SPF, one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPStrato
Total observations9
Active days5
Avg per active day1.8
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 4 weeks ago
Cadence~every 2 weeks
Compare Fenjaengelhardt with another brand:

Email setup 70/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
70/100
SPF
neutral
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 2/10
Authentication

DMARC enforced with p=reject — receivers actively reject or quarantine spoofed mail. No aggregate reporting destination configured.

DKIM alignment: all 3 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with fenjaengelhardt.de (fenjaengelhardt.de). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Strato ✓ via sending IP

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Mailjet

Probed: fenjaengelhardt.de

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 9 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Strato 5
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Apr 1 – Jun 1, 2026 · 3 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

5 0 Strato: 2 (2026-04-01)2Strato: 5 (2026-04-30)5Strato: 2 (2026-06-01)204/0104/0804/1504/2204/2905/0605/1305/2005/2706/01
Strato

Similar brands using Strato

Sending IPs

IP addresses fenjaengelhardt.de has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
81.169.146.220 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de 4 Check →
85.215.255.20 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de 2 Check →
85.215.255.24 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de 2 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
fenjaengelhardt.deStrato 9