Tech Week uses Mailchimp for marketing email and Amazon SES for transactional/notifications. They rank #929,484 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.
SPF alignment: 5% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (mail.tech-week.com); the rest use third-party paths (mail155.sea101.rsgsv.net, mail53.atl11.rsgsv.net, mail4.sea41.rsgsv.net) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 19 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with tech-week.com (tech-week.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 5 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: tech-week.com, mail.tech-week.com, mail4.sea41.rsgsv.net, mail155.sea101.rsgsv.net, mail26.suw15.mcsv.net, mail73.suw111.mcdlv.net, mail53.atl11.rsgsv.net, mail61.suw131.mcsv.net
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 16 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon SES | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Mailchimp | 15 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses tech-week.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 148.105.15.155 | mail155.sea101.rsgsv.net |
14 | — | Check → |
| 205.201.133.53 | mail53.atl11.rsgsv.net |
2 | 1 | Check → |
| 54.240.14.41 | a14-41.smtp-out.amazonses.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 148.105.13.4 | mail4.sea41.rsgsv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 198.2.182.26 | mail26.suw15.mcsv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 198.2.185.73 | mail73.suw111.mcdlv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 198.2.188.61 | mail61.suw131.mcsv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
tech-week.com | Mailchimp 20 Amazon SES 1 |