Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Rts uses Mailchimp as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).

Marketing ESPMailchimp
Total observations4
Active days2
Avg per active day2.0
Last activity📬 Active · yesterday
Cadence~weekly
Interested in using Mailchimp?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Rts with another brand:

Email setup 80/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
80/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 8/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to attentus.tech. Policy p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (mail145.atl61.mcsv.net) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with rts.tax, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with rts.tax (rts.tax). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Mailchimp ✓ via Mandrill

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace Mandrill SendGrid

Probed: rts.tax, mail145.atl61.mcsv.net

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 4 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Mailchimp 4
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 12 – Jun 29, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

3 0 Mailchimp: 3 (2026-06-12)3Mailchimp: 1 (2026-06-29)106/1206/1406/1606/1806/2006/2206/2406/2606/28
Mailchimp

Similar brands using Mailchimp

Sending IPs

IP addresses rts.tax has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
205.201.135.145 mail145.atl61.mcsv.net 4 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
rts.taxMailchimp 4