Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Reallygoodemails

reallygoodemails.com
🏆Rank #61,156 🏷 Marketing & Agencies 🇺🇸United States 📥 Inbox 75%

Reallygoodemails uses Cordial for marketing email and SendGrid for transactional/notifications. They rank #61,156 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. We've also observed sends via 2 other providers: Customer.io, Mailgun. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement. We've recorded 2 ESP changes since first observing this brand.

Marketing ESPCordial
Transactional ESPSendGrid
Total observations126
Active days24
Avg per active day5.3
Last activity📬 Active · today
Cadence~every 4 days

Other technologies

Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.

HTML builder RGE Studio
Compare Reallygoodemails with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 6/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 10 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to gmail.com. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: 79% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (cioeu110647.really.reallygoodemails.com); the rest use third-party paths (flowium.com, emailmarketingnyc.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 100 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with reallygoodemails.com (really.reallygoodemails.com, cioeu110647.really.reallygoodemails.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: 79% TLS 1.3, 21% TLS 1.2 (across 70 sends).

🐌 Significant delivery delays observed

7 of 33 emails in the last 7 days were delayed beyond 5 minutes (21%) — peaks past 15 minutes are well outside healthy sender behaviour. Slow sends averaged 19 min, peaked at 26 min. Healthy senders deliver in under 30 seconds. Consistent delays usually mean greylisting, reputation-based throttling, or receiver-side filter scrutiny — worth investigating sender reputation and authentication setup.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

Customer.io 17 Zendesk 3 Mailgun 1

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Cordial ✓ confirmed Mailgun ✓ confirmed SendGrid ✓ confirmed Customer.io ✓ via Mailgun

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: reallygoodemails.com, cioeu110647.really.reallygoodemails.com, flowium.com, emailmarketingnyc.com, really.reallygoodemails.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 88 75.2%
promotions 28 23.9%
spam 1 0.9%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Customer.io 17
52.9% 41.2% 5.9%
Cordial 94
78.7% 21.3% 0.0%
Mailgun 1
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
SendGrid 2
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Zendesk 3
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 10 – Jun 30, 2026 · 8 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

13 0 Cordial: 10 (2026-06-10)Customer.io: 1 (2026-06-10)11Cordial: 12 (2026-06-12)12Cordial: 12 (2026-06-17)12Cordial: 7 (2026-06-19)7Cordial: 5 (2026-06-24)5Customer.io: 13 (2026-06-25)13Cordial: 6 (2026-06-26)Customer.io: 1 (2026-06-26)7Cordial: 4 (2026-06-30)406/1006/1306/1606/1906/2206/2506/2806/30
🐌
🐌
🐌
Cordial Customer.io Zendesk SendGrid Mailgun

Similar brands using Cordial

Sending IPs

IP addresses reallygoodemails.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
192.112.156.2 d2.c156.cordialmail.net 19 1 Check →
192.112.156.30 d30.c156.cordialmail.net 15 6 Check →
192.112.157.2 d2.c157.cordialmail.net 12 Check →
192.112.157.29 d29.c157.cordialmail.net 10 4 Check →
192.112.159.4 d4.c159.cordialmail.net 10 5 Check →
185.250.238.78 v578.v5bda8fb2.euw1.send.eu.mailgun.net 8 5 Check →
192.112.159.3 d3.c159.cordialmail.net 7 Check →
192.112.159.2 d2.c159.cordialmail.net 7 1 Check →
198.244.60.101 a101.a5d06dfa.euw1.send.eu.mailgun.net 7 7 Check →
192.112.156.4 d4.c156.cordialmail.net 6 Check →
192.112.157.3 d3.c157.cordialmail.net 6 4 Check →
192.112.156.3 d3.c156.cordialmail.net 4 Check →
192.112.157.4 d4.c157.cordialmail.net 3 1 Check →
192.112.153.232 d232.c153.cordialmail.net 1 Check →
192.112.159.29 d29.c159.cordialmail.net 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
really.reallygoodemails.comCordial 103 Customer.io 17 Mailgun 1🐌 7/33 significant delay (avg 15 min, peak 26 min)
reallygoodemails.comZendesk 3 SendGrid 2