Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Paved

paved.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Real Estate 🇺🇸United States 📥 Inbox 30%

Paved uses Customer.io as their primary email service provider. We've also observed sends via MailerLite. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).

Marketing ESPCustomer.io
Total observations12
Active days9
Avg per active day1.3
Last activity📬 Active · 2 weeks ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Paved with another brand:

Email setup 85/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
85/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 6/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to cloudflare.net. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: 75% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (em9973.paved.com); the rest use third-party paths (mlsend.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 6 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with paved.com (paved.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

MailerLite 2

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

MailerLite ✓ confirmed Customer.io ✓ via SendGrid

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace SendGrid

Probed: paved.com, em9973.paved.com, mlsend.com, internal-tracking.paved.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 3 30.0%
promotions 7 70.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Customer.io 6
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
MailerLite 2
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 11 – Jun 17, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Customer.io: 1 (2026-06-11)1Customer.io: 2 (2026-06-17)206/1106/1206/1306/1406/1506/1606/17
Customer.io MailerLite

Similar brands using Customer.io

Sending IPs

IP addresses paved.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
168.245.125.51 o1.internal-tracking.paved.com 8 Check →
185.225.161.31 mail031.mlsend.com 2 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
paved.comCustomer.io 10 MailerLite 2