Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Nytimes

nytimes.com
🏆Rank #154 🏷 Media 🇺🇸United States ✓ Inbox 92%

Nytimes uses Responsys for marketing email and SparkPost for transactional/notifications. They rank #154 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 3 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100). We've recorded 1 ESP change since first observing this brand.

Marketing ESPResponsys
Transactional ESPSparkPost
Total observations206
Active days45
Avg per active day4.6
Last activity📬 Active · yesterday
Cadencealmost daily
Compare Nytimes with another brand:

Email setup 100/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
100/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
verified VMC
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 5/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 10 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to vali.email. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 166 observed emails use a return-path aligned with nytimes.com (bounce.nytimes.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 173 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with nytimes.com (nytimes.com, e.newyorktimes.com, service.newyorktimes.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Brand visibility

VMC issued by: digicert.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: 10% TLS 1.3, 90% TLS 1.2 (across 97 sends).

Delivery (last 7 days): 79% under 10 seconds, 4% over 1 minute (across 52 sends).

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Responsys ✓ confirmed SparkPost ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Amazon SES

Probed: nytimes.com, bounce.nytimes.com, e.newyorktimes.com, service.newyorktimes.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 143 91.7%
promotions 13 8.3%

Where emails landed (Outlook)

Placement observed in Outlook / Microsoft 365 mailboxes. Focused Inbox splits mail into two tabs, "Focused" (inbox) and "Other", plus Junk. 7% reached the Focused inbox across 15 observed emails.

Focused 7% (1) Other 87% (13) Junk 7% (1)

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Responsys 20
45.0% 55.0% 0.0%
SparkPost 129
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Apr 24 – Jun 29, 2026 · 53 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

13 0 Responsys: 1 (2026-04-24)1Responsys: 1 (2026-04-26)1Responsys: 1 (2026-04-28)1Responsys: 1 (2026-04-30)1SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-03)1SparkPost: 3 (2026-05-04)3SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-06)Responsys: 1 (2026-05-06)2SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-11)Responsys: 1 (2026-05-11)2SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-12)Responsys: 1 (2026-05-12)2SparkPost: 3 (2026-05-13)3SparkPost: 3 (2026-05-14)3SparkPost: 4 (2026-05-15)4SparkPost: 2 (2026-05-16)Responsys: 1 (2026-05-16)3SparkPost: 3 (2026-05-17)3SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-18)Responsys: 1 (2026-05-18)2SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-19)1SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-23)1SparkPost: 2 (2026-05-25)2SparkPost: 4 (2026-05-26)4SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-27)Responsys: 1 (2026-05-27)2SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-28)1SparkPost: 3 (2026-05-29)3SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-30)1SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-31)1SparkPost: 11 (2026-06-01)Responsys: 2 (2026-06-01)13SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-02)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-02)4SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-03)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-03)4SparkPost: 5 (2026-06-04)5SparkPost: 6 (2026-06-05)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-05)7SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-06)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-06)4SparkPost: 1 (2026-06-07)1SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-08)Responsys: 2 (2026-06-08)5SparkPost: 4 (2026-06-09)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-09)5SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-10)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-10)4SparkPost: 6 (2026-06-11)6SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-12)Responsys: 2 (2026-06-12)5SparkPost: 2 (2026-06-13)2SparkPost: 5 (2026-06-14)Responsys: 2 (2026-06-14)7SparkPost: 4 (2026-06-15)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-15)5SparkPost: 5 (2026-06-16)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-16)6SparkPost: 11 (2026-06-17)11SparkPost: 9 (2026-06-18)9SparkPost: 7 (2026-06-19)7SparkPost: 5 (2026-06-20)Responsys: 1 (2026-06-20)6SparkPost: 7 (2026-06-21)7SparkPost: 8 (2026-06-22)8SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-23)3SparkPost: 4 (2026-06-24)4SparkPost: 5 (2026-06-25)5SparkPost: 2 (2026-06-26)2SparkPost: 1 (2026-06-27)1SparkPost: 2 (2026-06-28)2SparkPost: 3 (2026-06-29)Responsys: 5 (2026-06-29)804/2405/0105/0805/1505/2205/2906/0506/1206/1906/26
🐢
🐌
🐢
🐢
SparkPost Responsys

Similar brands using Responsys

Sending IPs

IP addresses nytimes.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
156.70.4.234 mta-70-4-234.sparkpostmail.com 16 2 Check →
156.70.13.175 mta-70-13-175.sparkpostmail.com 14 3 Check →
156.70.13.173 mta-70-13-173.sparkpostmail.com 13 1 Check →
156.70.4.84 mta-70-4-84.sparkpostmail.com 12 1 Check →
192.174.83.71 mta-83-71.sparkpostmail.com 12 1 Check →
156.70.13.178 mta-70-13-178.sparkpostmail.com 11 2 Check →
156.70.13.174 mta-70-13-174.sparkpostmail.com 11 1 Check →
156.70.4.86 mta-70-4-86.sparkpostmail.com 10 3 Check →
156.70.4.83 mta-70-4-83.sparkpostmail.com 9 Check →
156.70.13.177 mta-70-13-177.sparkpostmail.com 8 4 Check →
192.174.83.69 mta-83-69.sparkpostmail.com 7 3 Check →
192.174.83.70 mta-83-70.sparkpostmail.com 7 1 Check →
156.70.13.176 mta-70-13-176.sparkpostmail.com 6 3 Check →
156.70.4.85 mta-70-4-85.sparkpostmail.com 6 2 Check →
156.70.4.233 mta-70-4-233.sparkpostmail.com 5 1 Check →
156.70.4.235 mta-70-4-235.sparkpostmail.com 5 Check →
66.163.186.205 sonic310-24.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 3 Check →
156.70.4.232 mta-70-4-232.sparkpostmail.com 3 1 Check →
66.163.191.82 sonic320-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 2 Check →
66.163.187.32 sonic308-9.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 2 Check →
66.163.189.148 sonic314-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 1 Check →
66.163.185.204 sonic321-23.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 1 Check →
66.163.188.82 sonic319-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 1 Check →
66.163.189.146 sonic314-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 1 Check →
66.163.189.31 sonic322-56.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
nytimes.comSparkPost 173
e.newyorktimes.comResponsys 31
service.newyorktimes.comResponsys 2