Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Napkin

napkin.ai
🏆Rank #42,622 🏷 SaaS 🇺🇸United States 📥 Inbox 79%

Napkin uses SparkPost as their primary email service provider. They rank #42,622 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).

Transactional ESPSparkPost
Total observations21
Active days5
Avg per active day4.2
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 4 weeks ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Napkin with another brand:

Email setup 80/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
80/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 6/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to cloudflare.net. Policy p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 17 observed emails use a return-path aligned with napkin.ai (mm-bounce.napkin.ai). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 17 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with napkin.ai (napkin.ai). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

SparkPost ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace Mandrill SendGrid

Probed: napkin.ai, mm-bounce.napkin.ai

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 11 78.6%
promotions 3 21.4%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
SparkPost 10
70.0% 30.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Apr 30 – Jun 2, 2026 · 4 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

9 0 SparkPost: 1 (2026-04-30)1SparkPost: 2 (2026-05-06)2SparkPost: 8 (2026-05-28)8SparkPost: 9 (2026-06-02)904/3005/0405/0805/1205/1605/2005/2405/2806/01
SparkPost

Similar brands using SparkPost

Sending IPs

IP addresses napkin.ai has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
192.174.90.59 mta-174-90-59.sparkpostmail.com 19 Check →
168.203.49.164 mta-203-49-164.sparkpostmail.com 2 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
napkin.aiSparkPost 21