Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Juicebox

juicebox.work
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 SaaS

Juicebox uses Customer.io as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).

Marketing ESPCustomer.io
Total observations7
Active days5
Avg per active day1.4
Last activity💤 Dormant · 5 weeks ago
Cadence~every 3 days
Compare Juicebox with another brand:

Email setup 100/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
100/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
verified VMC
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 2/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to juicebox.work. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 7 observed emails use a return-path aligned with juicebox.work (cio121345.juicebox.work). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 3 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with juicebox.work (cio121345.juicebox.work). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Brand visibility

VMC issued by: digicert.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Customer.io ✓ via Mailgun

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace Mailgun

Probed: juicebox.work, cio121345.juicebox.work

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 6 85.7%
spam 1 14.3%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Customer.io 7
85.7% 0.0% 14.3%

ESP activity over time

May 15 – May 28, 2026 · 5 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Customer.io: 2 (2026-05-15)2Customer.io: 1 (2026-05-19)1Customer.io: 1 (2026-05-20)1Customer.io: 1 (2026-05-22)1Customer.io: 2 (2026-05-28)205/1505/1705/1905/2105/2305/2505/27
Customer.io

Similar brands using Customer.io

Sending IPs

IP addresses juicebox.work has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
198.244.52.4 a4.a355d2fe.use4.send.mailgun.net 6 Check →
159.112.241.115 v5115.v5c4dda55.use4.send.mailgun.net 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
juicebox.workCustomer.io 7