Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Gizmodo

gizmodo.com
🏆Rank #1,889 🏷 Media 🇺🇸United States

Gizmodo uses Mailchimp as their primary email service provider. They rank #1,889 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 90/100).

Marketing ESPMailchimp
Total observations3
Active days1
Avg per active day3.0
Last activity💤 Dormant · 5 weeks ago
Cadenceone-off
Interested in using Mailchimp?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Gizmodo with another brand:

Email setup 90/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
90/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
pass
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 4/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to cloudflare.net. Policy p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (mail31.suw91.mcdlv.net) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with gizmodo.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 3 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with gizmodo.com (gizmodo.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Mailchimp ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace Mandrill

Probed: gizmodo.com, mail31.suw91.mcdlv.net

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 3 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Mailchimp 3
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

No sends in the last 30 days. View all time to see history.

Similar brands using Mailchimp

Sending IPs

IP addresses gizmodo.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
198.2.184.31 mail31.suw91.mcdlv.net 3 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
gizmodo.comMailchimp 3