Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Gen

gen.tech
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 SaaS

Gen uses SendPulse as their primary email service provider. We've also observed sends via Yespo. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).

Marketing ESPSendPulse
Total observations4
Active days3
Avg per active day1.3
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 4 weeks ago
Cadence~every 3 days
Compare Gen with another brand:

Email setup 85/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
85/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 8/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to dark-cloud.tech. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: 50% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (mail.journal.gen.tech); the rest use third-party paths (spsndr.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with gen.tech (gen.tech, journal.gen.tech). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

Yespo 2

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

SendPulse ✓ confirmed Yespo ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace Mailchimp Mailersend Microsoft 365 Salesforce MC

Probed: gen.tech, spsndr.com, mail.journal.gen.tech, journal.gen.tech

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 4 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
SendPulse 2
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Yespo 2
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 27 – Jun 4, 2026 · 3 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 SendPulse: 1 (2026-05-27)1Yespo: 2 (2026-05-29)2SendPulse: 1 (2026-06-04)105/2705/2805/2905/3005/3106/0106/0206/0306/04
SendPulse Yespo

Similar brands using SendPulse

Sending IPs

IP addresses gen.tech has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
52.51.203.147 m67.esputnik.com 2 Check →
213.109.77.63 mx349.spsndr.com 1 Check →
213.109.77.198 mx39.spsndr.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
gen.techSendPulse 2
journal.gen.techYespo 2