Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Foxcreekfarmcsa

foxcreekfarmcsa.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Food & Beverage 🇺🇸United States

Foxcreekfarmcsa uses Mailchimp as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPMailchimp
Total observations3
Active days2
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 2 weeks ago
Cadence~every 3 months
Interested in using Mailchimp?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Foxcreekfarmcsa with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 10/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to turiscilipoti.com. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (mail68.atl281.mcsv.net) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with foxcreekfarmcsa.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with foxcreekfarmcsa.com (foxcreekfarmcsa.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Mailchimp ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Amazon SES Mandrill SendGrid

Probed: foxcreekfarmcsa.com, mail68.atl281.mcsv.net

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 3 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Mailchimp 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jan 5 – Jun 8, 2026 · 2 weeks with sends

Weekly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Mailchimp: 2 (week of 2026-01-05)2Mailchimp: 1 (week of 2026-06-08)1Jan 5Jan 26Feb 16Mar 9Mar 30Apr 20May 11Jun 1
Mailchimp

Similar brands using Mailchimp

Sending IPs

IP addresses foxcreekfarmcsa.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
198.2.178.114 mail22.mcsignup.com 2 Check →
198.2.143.68 mail68.atl281.mcsv.net 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
foxcreekfarmcsa.comMailchimp 3