Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Flyporter

flyporter.com
🏆Rank #35,269 🏷 Travel

Flyporter uses SparkPost as their primary email service provider. They rank #35,269 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Transactional ESPSparkPost
Total observations7
Active days5
Avg per active day1.4
Last activity📬 Active · 7 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Flyporter with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 8/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

DKIM alignment: all 7 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with flyporter.com (communications.flyporter.com, notifications.flyporter.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

SparkPost ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Amazon SES Google Workspace

Probed: flyporter.com, communications.flyporter.com, notifications.flyporter.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 6 85.7%
promotions 1 14.3%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
SparkPost 7
85.7% 14.3% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 26 – Jun 23, 2026 · 5 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

3 0 SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-26)1SparkPost: 3 (2026-05-27)3SparkPost: 1 (2026-05-28)1SparkPost: 1 (2026-06-01)1SparkPost: 1 (2026-06-23)105/2605/2906/0106/0406/0706/1006/1306/1606/1906/22
SparkPost

Similar brands using SparkPost

Sending IPs

IP addresses flyporter.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
137.22.225.87 wzytcgmk.communications.flyporter.com 6 1 Check →
137.22.224.250 th18k3gh.notifications.flyporter.com 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
communications.flyporter.comSparkPost 6
notifications.flyporter.comSparkPost 1