Capitalfocusreview uses Iterable for marketing email and Amazon SES for transactional/notifications. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 2 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC enforced with p=reject — receivers actively reject or quarantine spoofed mail. No aggregate reporting destination configured.
SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (amazonses.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with capitalfocusreview.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 10 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with capitalfocusreview.com (email.capitalfocusreview.com, updates.capitalfocusreview.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: modern — 80% TLS 1.3 (across 5 sends).
Delivery (last 7 days): 50% under 10 seconds, 50% over 1 minute (across 2 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: capitalfocusreview.com, amazonses.com, email.capitalfocusreview.com, updates.capitalfocusreview.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 3 | 30.0% |
| promotions | 3 | 30.0% |
| spam | 4 | 40.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iterable | 9 | 33.3% | 22.2% | 44.4% | |
| Amazon SES | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses capitalfocusreview.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 204.220.188.241 | v5241.v55bb5cfa.usw1.send.mailgun.net |
5 | 1 | Check → |
| 54.240.78.81 | a78-81.smtp-out.amazonses.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 54.240.78.190 | a78-190.smtp-out.amazonses.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 54.240.79.144 | a79-144.smtp-out.amazonses.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 54.240.79.210 | a79-210.smtp-out.amazonses.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
email.capitalfocusreview.com | Iterable 5 | |
updates.capitalfocusreview.com | Iterable 4 Amazon SES 1 |