Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Wooning

wooning.nl
🏆Rank #209,395 🏷 Real Estate 🇳🇱Netherlands

Wooning uses Deployteq as their primary email service provider. They rank #209,395 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).

Marketing ESPDeployteq
Total observations3
Active days2
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity📬 Active · 5 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Wooning with another brand:

Email setup 85/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
85/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 4/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to dmarcadvisor.com. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

DKIM alignment: all 3 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with wooning.nl (e.wooning.nl). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Deployteq ✓ via sending IP

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: wooning.nl, e.wooning.nl

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 3 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Deployteq 3
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 9 – Jun 25, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Deployteq: 2 (2026-06-09)2Deployteq: 1 (2026-06-25)106/0906/1106/1306/1506/1706/1906/2106/2306/25
Deployteq

Similar brands using Deployteq

Sending IPs

IP addresses wooning.nl has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
52.58.181.240 mta-048.msdp1.com 2 Check →
176.110.104.128 128-smta.msdp1.com 1 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
e.wooning.nlDeployteq 3