Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Vibers

vibers.so
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Telecom Somalia ✓ Inbox 92%

Vibers uses Amazon SES as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Transactional ESPAmazon SES
Total observations13
Active days6
Avg per active day2.2
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 2 weeks ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Vibers with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 1/10
Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (eu-west-2.amazonses.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with vibers.so, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with vibers.so (mail.vibers.so). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Amazon SES ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: vibers.so, eu-west-2.amazonses.com, mail.vibers.so

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 12 92.3%
promotions 1 7.7%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Amazon SES 13
92.3% 7.7% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 12 – Jun 15, 2026 · 6 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

4 0 Amazon SES: 2 (2026-05-12)2Amazon SES: 2 (2026-05-15)2Amazon SES: 4 (2026-05-18)4Amazon SES: 2 (2026-05-20)2Amazon SES: 2 (2026-06-09)2Amazon SES: 1 (2026-06-15)105/1205/1605/2005/2405/2806/0106/0506/0906/1306/15
Amazon SES

Similar brands using Amazon SES

Sending IPs

IP addresses vibers.so has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
23.249.218.56 d218-56.smtp-out.eu-west-2.amazonses.com 4 Check →
23.249.218.55 d218-55.smtp-out.eu-west-2.amazonses.com 3 Check →
23.249.218.52 d218-52.smtp-out.eu-west-2.amazonses.com 2 Check →
23.249.218.51 d218-51.smtp-out.eu-west-2.amazonses.com 2 Check →
23.249.218.50 d218-50.smtp-out.eu-west-2.amazonses.com 2 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
mail.vibers.soAmazon SES 13