Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Versionista

versionista.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Media 🇺🇸United States 📥 Inbox 70%

Versionista uses SendGrid as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement, one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPSendGrid
Total observations10
Active days5
Avg per active day2.0
Last activity📬 Active · 12 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Versionista with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 1/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 4 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: all 10 observed emails use a return-path aligned with versionista.com (send.versionista.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 10 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with versionista.com (versionista.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 6 sends).

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

SendGrid ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: versionista.com, send.versionista.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 7 70.0%
promotions 3 30.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
SendGrid 10
70.0% 30.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 21 – Jun 19, 2026 · 7 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

3 0 SendGrid: 1 (2026-05-21)1SendGrid: 1 (2026-05-24)1SendGrid: 1 (2026-05-25)1SendGrid: 1 (2026-06-07)1SendGrid: 2 (2026-06-08)2SendGrid: 1 (2026-06-18)1SendGrid: 3 (2026-06-19)305/2105/2405/2705/3006/0206/0506/0806/1106/1406/1706/19
SendGrid

Similar brands using SendGrid

Sending IPs

IP addresses versionista.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
167.89.77.211 xtrwqddp.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net 8 3 Check →
167.89.11.79 xtrwhbqf.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net 2 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
versionista.comSendGrid 10