Verizonwireless uses Marketo as their primary email service provider. They rank #6,429 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to Return Path / Validity. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: 6% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (email.b2binfo.verizonwireless.com); the rest use third-party paths (8v9kbi0fwn4znrgo.o8mfw6s62ibswjk0.7xiakoi.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, kb9qzd3x0yrdyd.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, 14nnc1rjjzxvyjqx.xu77w583w9qap4qf.6w9fm.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 129 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with verizonwireless.com (verizonwireless.com, b2binfo.verizonwireless.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
VMC issued by: digicert.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: verizonwireless.com, email.b2binfo.verizonwireless.com, pei0y2ne8yskawtf.5e9gjtzfzxmzdn7s.d6y60ol.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, t7ly7m85pfmotfyo.ebyydg68le5jlcyj.6lf8g.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, rfjlcze17gwl7vyl.61oijp72a9r1h8xh.sf4j6b3.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, kb9qzd3x0yrdyd.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, bmu63qkszcp27vwg.2xgxr7pie7crxbya.ob4nq7v.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, 80c63s52eiyh27b4.umtwjolcfk1xwi4f.w6ro.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, vjlsvpnmxlhk42jd.kicgc105us2c7l2m.4argt.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, wmikwezycmxmh0ql.r7fyp4812o3uqqpb.tg3f.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, g8yv2fzrr39tge21.yozh05f83jp3dllz.xg1152.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, 4sq0gzw0rc1123.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 9 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketo | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses verizonwireless.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 192.28.151.27 | email.b2binfo.verizonwireless.com |
9 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
b2binfo.verizonwireless.com | Marketo 9 |