Verizon uses Adobe Campaign for marketing email and Amazon SES for transactional/notifications. They rank #2,201 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. We've also observed sends via Dotdigital. Email goes out from 3 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).
Amazon SESAuthentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to Return Path / Validity. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: 4% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (ses-us-west-2.vens.verizon.com); the rest use third-party paths (dq3yn6mtwb0.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, gauhivt8xws.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, e91n3jee866kkk.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 40 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with verizon.com (verizon.com, customer.verizon.com, vens.verizon.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
VMC issued by: digicert.
TLS: 33% TLS 1.3, 67% TLS 1.2 (across 9 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
Dotdigital 1ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: verizon.com, ses-us-west-2.vens.verizon.com, wkpsr12sbzvje5.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, 21um53wqk5ub.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, 0vwksy3wfius.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, 7tc3v98c8h4n3r.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, gauhivt8xws.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, dq3yn6mtwb0.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, us-west-2.amazonses.com, e91n3jee866kkk.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, ln3tx0syiab1.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com, p0zautzhv733.d-hzm2eae.usa720.bnc.salesforce.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 14 | 87.5% |
| promotions | 2 | 12.5% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe Campaign | 13 | 92.3% | 7.7% | 0.0% | |
| Dotdigital | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| Amazon SES | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses verizon.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
customer.verizon.com | Adobe Campaign 14 Dotdigital 1 | |
vens.verizon.com | Amazon SES 1 | |
family.verizon.com | Amazon SES 1 |