Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Userevidence

userevidence.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 SaaS 🇺🇸United States

Userevidence uses Beehiiv as their primary email service provider. We've also observed sends via HubSpot. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPBeehiiv
Total observations3
Active days2
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity💤 Dormant · 7 weeks ago
Cadence~every 2 weeks
Interested in using Beehiiv?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Userevidence with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 3/10
Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: 50% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (em6404.e.userevidence.com); the rest use third-party paths (bf10x.hubspotemail.net) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

HubSpot 1

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

HubSpot ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace SendGrid

Probed: userevidence.com, em6404.e.userevidence.com, bf10x.hubspotemail.net, e.userevidence.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 3 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Beehiiv 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
HubSpot 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Apr 23 – May 14, 2026 · 3 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Beehiiv: 1 (2026-04-23)1Beehiiv: 1 (2026-05-06)1HubSpot: 1 (2026-05-14)104/2304/2604/2905/0205/0505/0805/1105/14
Beehiiv HubSpot

Similar brands using Beehiiv

Sending IPs

IP addresses userevidence.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
159.183.140.223 o168.ptr7383.mail.beehiiv.com 2 Check →
143.244.89.32 bd77f6q.bf10x.hubspotemail.net 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
e.userevidence.comBeehiiv 2
userevidence.comHubSpot 1