Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Text

text.com
🏆Rank #38,252 🏷 Media

Text uses HubSpot as their primary email service provider. They rank #38,252 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).

Marketing ESPHubSpot
Total observations6
Active days4
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity📬 Active · 2 weeks ago
Cadence~every 2 weeks
Interested in using HubSpot?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Text with another brand:

Email setup 100/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
100/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
verified VMC
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 4/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to Postmark DMARC. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (26269451m.livechat.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with text.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with text.com (text.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

HubSpot ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: text.com, 26269451m.livechat.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
promotions 5 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
HubSpot 5
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Apr 28 – Jun 16, 2026 · 4 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 HubSpot: 1 (2026-04-28)1HubSpot: 1 (2026-05-18)1HubSpot: 2 (2026-05-27)2HubSpot: 2 (2026-06-16)204/2805/0305/0805/1305/1805/2305/2806/0206/0706/1206/16
HubSpot

Similar brands using HubSpot

Sending IPs

IP addresses text.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
143.244.81.43 bd77el5.26269451m.livechat.com 5 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
text.comHubSpot 6