Stripo uses Yespo as their primary email service provider. They rank #47,346 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).
Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.
| HTML builder | |
| AMP for Email | Yes |
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 10 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to stripo.email. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
DKIM alignment: all 44 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with stripo.email (stripo.email). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
VMC issued by: digicert.
TLS: 0% TLS 1.3, 100% TLS 1.2 (across 25 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 12 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: stripo.email, notifications.stripo.email
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 43 | 69.4% |
| promotions | 19 | 30.6% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yespo | 48 | 62.5% | 37.5% | 0.0% | |
| eSputnik | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Monthly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses stripo.email has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.72.76.202 | m118.esputnik.com |
19 | 2 | Check → |
| 54.170.158.219 | m119.esputnik.com |
14 | 9 | Check → |
| 108.128.78.148 | m120.esputnik.com |
12 | 1 | Check → |
| 54.246.69.90 | m121.esputnik.com |
11 | 1 | Check → |
| 34.252.105.142 | m84.esputnik.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 52.30.189.167 | m77.esputnik.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 52.50.122.135 | m44.esputnik.com |
1 | — | Check → |