Stainless uses Postmark as their primary email service provider. They rank #672,851 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100). Missing: one-click unsubscribe.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 2 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to cloudflare.net. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 7 observed emails use a return-path aligned with stainless.com (pm-bounces.stainless.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with stainless.com (stainless.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: stainless.com, pm-bounces.stainless.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 7 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postmark | 7 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses stainless.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104.245.209.202 | mta202a-ord.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.201 | mta201a-ord.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.231 | mta231b-ord.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 50.31.205.204 | mta204-ab1.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 50.31.205.205 | mta205-ab1.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.200 | mta200a-ord.mtasv.net |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| 104.245.209.203 | mta203a-ord.mtasv.net |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
stainless.com | Postmark 7 |