Stage uses HubSpot for marketing email and SparkPost for transactional/notifications. They rank #376,896 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.
SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (bf07.eu1.hubspotemail.net, transactional.eu1.hubspotemail.net, securebounce.stage-entertainment.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with stage.es, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 8 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with stage.es (newsletter.stage.es, shop.stage.es). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: stage.es, bf07.eu1.hubspotemail.net, transactional.eu1.hubspotemail.net, securebounce.stage-entertainment.com, newsletter.stage.es, shop.stage.es
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 2 | 18.2% |
| promotions | 9 | 81.8% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| SparkPost | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses stage.es has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143.244.81.146 | bd77eo0.transactional.eu1.hubspotemail.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 108.179.145.101 | 4f2nzr.bf07.eu1.hubspotemail.net |
2 | 1 | Check → |
| 199.15.227.119 | mta-15-227-119.sparkpostmail.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.84.99 | bd77e81.bf07.eu1.hubspotemail.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.86.1 | bd77fkj.transactional.eu1.hubspotemail.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.83.5 | bd77ezb.transactional.eu1.hubspotemail.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.86.2 | bd77fkk.transactional.eu1.hubspotemail.net |
1 | — | Check → |