Smartymeapp uses Yespo as their primary email service provider. They rank #237,689 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).
Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.
| HTML builder |
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 10 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to smartymeapp.com. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 40 observed emails use a return-path aligned with smartymeapp.com (send.smartymeapp.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 40 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with smartymeapp.com (smartymeapp.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 0% TLS 1.3, 100% TLS 1.2 (across 40 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 40 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: smartymeapp.com, send.smartymeapp.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 12 | 92.3% |
| promotions | 1 | 7.7% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yespo | 13 | 92.3% | 7.7% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses smartymeapp.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.17.18.180 | m21.esputnik.com |
5 | 1 | Check → |
| 34.250.52.17 | m82.esputnik.com |
5 | 1 | Check → |
| 52.30.60.240 | m74.esputnik.com |
4 | 4 | Check → |
| 52.48.79.114 | m40.esputnik.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 52.30.45.104 | m73.esputnik.com |
4 | 2 | Check → |
| 52.51.204.72 | m72.esputnik.com |
4 | 1 | Check → |
| 34.251.202.55 | m87.esputnik.com |
3 | 2 | Check → |
| 34.252.105.142 | m84.esputnik.com |
2 | 1 | Check → |
| 52.50.252.181 | m71.esputnik.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 52.50.122.135 | m44.esputnik.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 52.30.131.223 | m48.esputnik.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 52.17.235.135 | m76.esputnik.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| 52.51.208.208 | m69.esputnik.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 54.154.204.161 | m56.esputnik.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 52.51.169.85 | m65.esputnik.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 52.48.107.202 | m22.esputnik.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
smartymeapp.com | Yespo 40 |
