Shecom uses HubSpot as their primary email service provider. We've also observed sends via Omnisend. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 4 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to shecom.co. Policy
p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.
SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (bf10x.hubspotemail.net) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with shecom.co, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 17 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with shecom.co (shecom.co). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 0% TLS 1.3, 100% TLS 1.2 (across 5 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 3 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
Omnisend 3ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: shecom.co, bf10x.hubspotemail.net
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 16 | 88.9% |
| promotions | 2 | 11.1% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | 13 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Omnisend | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses shecom.co has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143.244.89.79 | bd77f71.bf10x.hubspotemail.net |
5 | 1 | Check → |
| 143.244.89.106 | bd77f8s.bf10x.hubspotemail.net |
5 | 2 | Check → |
| 143.244.89.38 | bd77f6w.bf10x.hubspotemail.net |
4 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.89.18 | bd77f6c.bf10x.hubspotemail.net |
3 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.89.22 | bd77f6g.bf10x.hubspotemail.net |
3 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.89.36 | bd77f6u.bf10x.hubspotemail.net |
1 | — | Check → |