Segmentflow Test uses Amazon SES as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Amazon SESAuthentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.
SPF alignment: 92% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (send.mail.segmentflow-test.xyz); the rest use third-party paths (segmentflow.ai) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with segmentflow-test.xyz (mail.segmentflow-test.xyz). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: segmentflow-test.xyz, segmentflow.ai, send.mail.segmentflow-test.xyz, mail.segmentflow-test.xyz
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 11 | 84.6% |
| promotions | 2 | 15.4% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon SES | 12 | 91.7% | 8.3% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses segmentflow-test.xyz has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.169.224.12 | b224-12.smtp-out.eu-central-1.amazonses.com |
3 | 1 | Check → |
| 69.169.224.7 | b224-7.smtp-out.eu-central-1.amazonses.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 69.169.224.8 | b224-8.smtp-out.eu-central-1.amazonses.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 69.169.224.11 | b224-11.smtp-out.eu-central-1.amazonses.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
mail.segmentflow-test.xyz | Amazon SES 8 |
