Secretstradingchoice uses Pepipost

Secretstradingchoice uses Pepipost as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is incomplete (score 50/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Transactional ESP

Pepipost

Total observations21

Active days8

Avg per active day2.6

Last activity📬 Active · 8 days ago

Cadence~weekly

Compare Secretstradingchoice with another brand:

Email setup 50/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

⚠

Setup has gaps

Some authentication is missing or weak — receivers may give less benefit of the doubt.

50/100

SPF

pass

DKIM

pass

DMARC

multiple records

BIMI

none

Unsubscribe

one-click

SPF lookups 1/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

Multiple DMARC records published — receivers apply no DMARC at all (RFC 7489). The domain is effectively unprotected until the duplicate record is removed.

SPF alignment: all 20 observed emails use a return-path aligned with secretstradingchoice.com (nc2048.stc.secretstradingchoice.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 7 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with secretstradingchoice.com (stc.secretstradingchoice.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Pepipost ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: secretstradingchoice.com, nc2048.stc.secretstradingchoice.com, stc.secretstradingchoice.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

Folder	Count	Share
inbox	8	50.0%
promotions	5	31.3%
spam	3	18.8%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP	Emails	Placement	Inbox %	Tabs %	Spam %
Pepipost	16		50.0%	31.3%	18.8%

ESP activity over time

May 12 – Jun 22, 2026 · 8 days with sends

Last 30d Last 90d

By ESP By inbox/spam

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.