Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Scottoldford

scottoldford.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Education 🇬🇧United Kingdom ✓ Inbox 100%

Scottoldford uses Postmark as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is weak (score 35/100).

Transactional ESPPostmark
Total observations13
Active days7
Avg per active day1.9
Last activity📬 Active · 5 days ago
Cadence~every 3 days
Compare Scottoldford with another brand:

Email setup 35/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

🚨
Spoofing risk — weak authentication
Major authentication signals missing. This brand is easy to impersonate.
35/100
SPF
fail
DKIM
pass
DMARC
fail
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 2/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 5 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

No DMARC record published. Domain is not protected against spoofing.

SPF alignment: all 16 observed emails use a return-path aligned with scottoldford.com (pm-bounces.scottoldford.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 16 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with scottoldford.com (scottoldford.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 5 sends).

Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 3 sends).

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Postmark ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: scottoldford.com, pm-bounces.scottoldford.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 16 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Postmark 13
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 4 – Jun 25, 2026 · 7 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

3 0 Postmark: 2 (2026-06-04)2Postmark: 3 (2026-06-09)3Postmark: 3 (2026-06-11)3Postmark: 2 (2026-06-18)2Postmark: 1 (2026-06-23)1Postmark: 1 (2026-06-24)1Postmark: 1 (2026-06-25)106/0406/0706/1006/1306/1606/1906/2206/25
Postmark

Similar brands using Postmark

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
scottoldford.comPostmark 13