Sceg uses Salesforce MC

Sceg uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. They rank #734,267 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 70/100). Missing: one-click unsubscribe.

Marketing ESP

Salesforce MC

Total observations7

Active days3

Avg per active day2.3

Last activity📬 Active · 13 days ago

Cadence~weekly

Compare Sceg with another brand:

Email setup 70/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

✓

Solid setup, room to improve

Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.

70/100

SPF

pass

DKIM

pass

DMARC

pass (reject)

BIMI

none

Unsubscribe

missing

SPF lookups 2/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 2 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to proofpoint.com. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 7 observed emails use a return-path aligned with sceg.com (bounce.messages.sceg.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 7 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with sceg.com (messages.sceg.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Salesforce MC observed

"Observed" pills mean we detected emails from these ESPs, but they don't appear in any SPF record we probed. They may still be properly authorized — sending infrastructure can live on subdomains we haven't seen yet, or use IP-listing instead of include: directives.

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Proofpoint

Probed: sceg.com, bounce.messages.sceg.com, messages.sceg.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

Folder	Count	Share
inbox	7	100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP	Emails	Placement	Inbox %	Tabs %	Spam %
Salesforce MC	7		100.0%	0.0%	0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 5 – Jun 18, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Last 30d Last 90d

By ESP By inbox/spam

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.