Saleshackers uses Encharge for marketing email and SparkPost for transactional/notifications. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).
Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.
| HTML builder |
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 3 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to saleshackers.es. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 16 observed emails use a return-path aligned with saleshackers.es (rebote.saleshackers.es, smtpapi.saleshackers.es). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 15 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with saleshackers.es (saleshackers.es). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 45% TLS 1.3, 55% TLS 1.2 (across 11 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: saleshackers.es, rebote.saleshackers.es, smtpapi.saleshackers.es
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 18 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Encharge | 5 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| SparkPost | 11 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses saleshackers.es has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 156.70.34.146 | mta-70-34-146.sparkpostmail.com |
7 | — | Check → |
| 168.203.46.168 | mta-203-46-168.sparkpostmail.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 192.254.118.193 | o10.smtpapi.encharge-mail.com |
3 | 2 | Check → |
| 156.70.34.144 | mta-70-34-144.sparkpostmail.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 134.128.119.244 | vsvhttfq.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
2 | 2 | Check → |