Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Rwater

rwater.com
🏆Rank #972,816 🏷 Food & Beverage

Rwater uses SendGrid as their primary email service provider. They rank #972,816 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100). Missing: one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPSendGrid
Total observations2
Active days2
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity💤 Dormant · 5 weeks ago
Cadence~every 5 months
Compare Rwater with another brand:

Email setup 80/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
80/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 4/10
Authentication

DMARC enforced with p=quarantine — receivers actively reject or quarantine spoofed mail. No aggregate reporting destination configured.

SPF alignment: all 2 observed emails use a return-path aligned with rwater.com (em5289.rwater.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 2 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with rwater.com (rwater.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

SendGrid ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Microsoft 365

Probed: rwater.com, em5289.rwater.com, ptr3881.rwater.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 2 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
SendGrid 2
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Aug 18, 2025 – May 25, 2026 · 2 weeks with sends

Weekly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 SendGrid: 1 (week of 2025-08-18)1SendGrid: 1 (week of 2026-05-25)1Aug 18 '25Sep 22 '25Oct 27 '25Dec 1 '25Jan 5 '26Feb 9 '26Mar 16 '26Apr 20 '26May 25 '26
SendGrid

Similar brands using SendGrid

Sending IPs

IP addresses rwater.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
168.245.126.251 o1.ptr3881.rwater.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
rwater.comSendGrid 2