Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Redhat

redhat.com
🏆Rank #625 🏷 SaaS 🇺🇸United States

Redhat uses Marketo as their primary email service provider. They rank #625 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).

Marketing ESPMarketo
Total observations3
Active days2
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity💤 Dormant · 5 weeks ago
Cadence~every 2 weeks
Compare Redhat with another brand:

Email setup 80/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
80/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 9/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to DMARC Analyzer (Mimecast). Policy p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 1 observed email use a return-path aligned with redhat.com (mail01.go.explore.redhat.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with redhat.com (go.explore.redhat.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Marketo ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Adobe Campaign Amazon SES Salesforce MC SendGrid

Probed: redhat.com, mail01.go.explore.redhat.com, go.explore.redhat.com, explore.redhat.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 2 66.7%
promotions 1 33.3%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Marketo 2
50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 7 – May 28, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Marketo: 1 (2026-05-07)1Marketo: 2 (2026-05-28)205/0705/1005/1305/1605/1905/2205/2505/28
Marketo

Similar brands using Marketo

Sending IPs

IP addresses redhat.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
192.28.152.111 mail01.go.explore.redhat.com 1 Check →
192.28.152.130 mail03.go.explore.redhat.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
go.explore.redhat.comMarketo 3