Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Radletters

radletters.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Media

Radletters uses Postmark as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement, one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPPostmark
Total observations6
Active days4
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity💤 Dormant · 6 weeks ago
Cadencealmost daily
Compare Radletters with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 1/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to cloudflare.net. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: all 6 observed emails use a return-path aligned with radletters.com (pm-bounces.radletters.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 3 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with radletters.com (radletters.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Postmark ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: radletters.com, pm-bounces.radletters.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 6 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Postmark 6
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 19 – May 21, 2026 · 3 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Postmark: 2 (2026-05-19)2Postmark: 2 (2026-05-20)2Postmark: 2 (2026-05-21)205/1905/2005/21
Postmark

Similar brands using Postmark

Sending IPs

IP addresses radletters.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
50.31.156.114 sc-ord-mta114.mtasv.net 3 Check →
50.31.156.117 sc-ord-mta117.mtasv.net 1 Check →
50.31.156.118 sc-ord-mta118.mtasv.net 1 Check →
50.31.156.120 sc-ord-mta120.mtasv.net 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
radletters.comPostmark 6