Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Puregoldencapital

puregoldencapital.com
🏆Rank N/A

Puregoldencapital uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).

Marketing ESPSalesforce MC
Total observations8
Active days1
Avg per active day8.0
Last activity💤 Dormant · 4 months ago
Cadenceone-off
Compare Puregoldencapital with another brand:

Email setup 85/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
85/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 1/10
Authentication

DMARC enforced with p=reject — receivers actively reject or quarantine spoofed mail. No aggregate reporting destination configured.

SPF alignment: all 8 observed emails use a return-path aligned with puregoldencapital.com (bounce.fin.puregoldencapital.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Salesforce MC ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: puregoldencapital.com, bounce.fin.puregoldencapital.com, fin.puregoldencapital.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
promotions 4 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Salesforce MC 4
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Mar 4 – Mar 15, 2026 · 8 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-04)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-06)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-10)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-11)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-12)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-13)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-14)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-03-15)103/0403/0603/0803/1003/1203/14
Salesforce MC

Similar brands using Salesforce MC

Sending IPs

IP addresses puregoldencapital.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
129.77.16.118 mta.fin.puregoldencapital.com 7 Check →
128.245.187.198 mta2.rest.restninvest.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
fin.puregoldencapital.comSalesforce MC 8