Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Postmarkapp

postmarkapp.com
🏆Rank #23,480 🏷 SaaS 🇺🇸United States ✓ Inbox 100%

Postmarkapp uses ActiveCampaign for marketing email and Postmark for transactional/notifications. They rank #23,480 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 3 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100). We've recorded 1 ESP change since first observing this brand.

Marketing ESPActiveCampaign
Transactional ESPPostmark
Total observations86
Active days23
Avg per active day3.7
Last activity📬 Active · 8 days ago
Cadence~every 3 days

Other technologies

Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.

HTML builder Stripo
Interested in using ActiveCampaign?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Postmarkapp with another brand:

Email setup 85/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
85/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 6/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 10 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to DMARC Digests. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: 84% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (pmbounces.postmarkapp.com, ac-bounces.fyi.postmarkapp.com, ac-bounces.postmarkapp.com); the rest use third-party paths (capitani.marketing, themathergroupllc.com, pm-bounces.schippers.eu) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 40 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with postmarkapp.com (postmarkapp.com, fyi.postmarkapp.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 24 sends).

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

ActiveCampaign ✓ confirmed Postmark ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Campaign Monitor Google Workspace

Probed: postmarkapp.com, pmbounces.postmarkapp.com, pm-bounces.schippers.eu, themathergroupllc.com, capitani.marketing, ac-bounces.fyi.postmarkapp.com, ac-bounces.postmarkapp.com, fyi.postmarkapp.com, mtasv.net

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 76 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Postmark 61
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Apr 17 – Jun 22, 2026 · 18 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

11 0 Postmark: 2 (2026-04-17)2Postmark: 2 (2026-04-19)2Postmark: 1 (2026-05-01)ActiveCampaign: 3 (2026-05-01)4Postmark: 4 (2026-05-02)4Postmark: 1 (2026-05-05)1Postmark: 1 (2026-05-06)1Postmark: 4 (2026-05-07)4Postmark: 3 (2026-05-08)3Postmark: 9 (2026-05-11)9Postmark: 2 (2026-05-12)2Postmark: 7 (2026-05-18)7Postmark: 1 (2026-05-22)1Postmark: 6 (2026-05-25)6Postmark: 11 (2026-06-01)11Postmark: 3 (2026-06-03)3Postmark: 6 (2026-06-08)6Postmark: 11 (2026-06-15)11Postmark: 9 (2026-06-22)904/1704/2405/0105/0805/1505/2205/2906/0506/1206/19
Postmark ActiveCampaign

Similar brands using ActiveCampaign

Sending IPs

IP addresses postmarkapp.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
104.245.209.203 mta203a-ord.mtasv.net 7 1 Check →
192.92.97.43 s1.csa1.acemsb2.com 6 1 Check →
104.245.209.199 mta199a-ord.mtasv.net 6 Check →
104.245.209.197 mta197a-ord.mtasv.net 5 Check →
50.31.156.117 sc-ord-mta117.mtasv.net 5 Check →
104.245.209.209 mta209a-ord.mtasv.net 3 Check →
104.245.209.204 mta204a-ord.mtasv.net 3 Check →
104.245.209.198 mta198a-ord.mtasv.net 3 Check →
50.31.156.114 sc-ord-mta114.mtasv.net 2 Check →
104.245.209.196 mta196a-ord.mtasv.net 2 2 Check →
104.245.209.205 mta205a-ord.mtasv.net 1 Check →
104.245.209.206 mta206a-ord.mtasv.net 1 Check →
104.245.209.208 mta208a-ord.mtasv.net 1 Check →
104.245.209.202 mta202a-ord.mtasv.net 1 Check →
50.31.156.116 sc-ord-mta116.mtasv.net 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
postmarkapp.comPostmark 67
mtasv.netPostmark 13
fyi.postmarkapp.comActiveCampaign 3 Postmark 3