Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Peerpush

peerpush.net
🌐Web popularity N/A 🏷 Marketing & Agencies

Peerpush uses Amazon SES as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100). Missing: one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPAmazon SES
Total observations2
Active days2
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity💤 Dormant · 6 weeks ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Peerpush with another brand:

Email setup 80/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
80/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 3/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to Postmark DMARC. Policy p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 1 observed email use a return-path aligned with peerpush.net (mail.peerpush.net). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with peerpush.net (peerpush.net). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Amazon SES ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: peerpush.net, mail.peerpush.net

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 1 50.0%
promotions 1 50.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Amazon SES 1
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 11 – May 20, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Amazon SES: 1 (2026-05-11)1Amazon SES: 1 (2026-05-20)105/1105/1205/1305/1405/1505/1605/1705/1805/1905/20
Amazon SES

Similar brands using Amazon SES

Sending IPs

IP addresses peerpush.net has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
54.240.4.15 a4-15.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com 1 Check →
54.240.4.4 a4-4.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
peerpush.netAmazon SES 2