Palome uses Klaviyo as their primary email service provider. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.
SPF alignment: all 16 observed emails use a return-path aligned with palome.com (k3.mail.palome.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 6 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with palome.com (mail.palome.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.
Probed: palome.com, k3.mail.palome.com, mail.palome.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 9 | 56.3% |
| promotions | 7 | 43.8% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klaviyo | 16 | 56.3% | 43.8% | 0.0% |
Weekly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses palome.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 170.203.28.47 | kl-203-28-47.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
4 | 1 | Check → |
| 170.203.24.13 | kl-203-24-13.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 170.203.20.51 | kl-203-20-51.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 170.203.20.54 | kl-203-20-54.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 170.203.16.16 | kl-203-16-16.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 170.203.20.12 | kl-203-20-12.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 170.203.16.15 | kl-203-16-15.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 170.203.24.12 | kl-203-24-12.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 170.203.24.2 | kl-203-24-2.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com |
1 | — | Check → |