Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Nsharma uses Brevo as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is incomplete (score 50/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPBrevo
Total observations4
Active days1
Avg per active day4.0
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 4 weeks ago
Cadenceone-off
Interested in using Brevo?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Nsharma with another brand:

Email setup 50/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Setup has gaps
Some authentication is missing or weak — receivers may give less benefit of the doubt.
50/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
multiple records
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 3/10
Authentication

Multiple DMARC records published — receivers apply no DMARC at all (RFC 7489). The domain is effectively unprotected until the duplicate record is removed.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (shared-p200-i10.d.sp2-brevo.net) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with nsharma.co, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with nsharma.co (nsharma.co). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Brevo ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: nsharma.co, shared-p200-i10.d.sp2-brevo.net

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 3 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Brevo 3
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 2 – Jun 2, 2026 · 1 day with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

4 0 Brevo: 4 (2026-06-02)406/02
Brevo

Similar brands using Brevo

Sending IPs

IP addresses nsharma.co has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
185.41.28.10 shared-p200-i10.d.sp2-brevo.net 4 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
nsharma.coBrevo 4