Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Newcastlene1ltd

newcastlene1ltd.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Retail 🇬🇧United Kingdom

Newcastlene1ltd uses Campaign Monitor as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPCampaign Monitor
Total observations4
Active days2
Avg per active day2.0
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 2 weeks ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Newcastlene1ltd with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 2/10
Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (cmail19.com, cmail20.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with newcastlene1ltd.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with newcastlene1ltd.com (newcastlene1ltd.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Campaign Monitor ✓ via sending IP

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Microsoft 365

Probed: newcastlene1ltd.com, cmail19.com, cmail20.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 4 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Campaign Monitor 4
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 9 – Jun 16, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Campaign Monitor: 2 (2026-06-09)2Campaign Monitor: 2 (2026-06-16)206/0906/1006/1106/1206/1306/1406/1506/16
Campaign Monitor

Similar brands using Campaign Monitor

Sending IPs

IP addresses newcastlene1ltd.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
203.55.21.138 mx138.a.outbound.createsend.com 2 Check →
203.55.21.133 mx133.a.outbound.createsend.com 2 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
newcastlene1ltd.comCampaign Monitor 4