Networkforgood uses SendGrid as their primary email service provider. They rank #28,149 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.
| HTML builder |
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to URIports. Policy
p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.
SPF alignment: all 7 observed emails use a return-path aligned with networkforgood.com (dmsprod.networkforgood.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 7 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with networkforgood.com (networkforgood.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.
Probed: networkforgood.com, dmsprod.networkforgood.com, ptr6284.networkforgood.com, emailer.networkforgood.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 8 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SendGrid | 7 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses networkforgood.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168.245.68.152 | o4.emailer.networkforgood.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.43.9 | o8.ptr6284.networkforgood.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.13.177 | o1.emailer.networkforgood.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 149.72.246.189 | wrqvfsbd.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 198.21.0.108 | cskrhhsc.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 159.183.146.133 | wfbtwnvr.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 159.183.146.131 | wfbtwnvp.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
networkforgood.com | SendGrid 8 |