Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Nacvi

nacvi.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Other

Nacvi uses Brevo as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPBrevo
Total observations2
Active days1
Avg per active day2.0
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 4 weeks ago
Cadenceone-off
Interested in using Brevo?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Nacvi with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 1/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to nacvi.com. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (gu.d.sender-sib.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with nacvi.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 2 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with nacvi.com (nacvi.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Brevo ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: nacvi.com, gu.d.sender-sib.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 2 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Brevo 2
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Nov 24, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026 · 2 weeks with sends

Weekly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Brevo: 1 (week of 2025-11-24)1Brevo: 1 (week of 2026-06-01)1Nov 24 '25Dec 15 '25Jan 5 '26Jan 26 '26Feb 16 '26Mar 9 '26Mar 30 '26Apr 20 '26May 11 '26Jun 1 '26
Brevo

Similar brands using Brevo

Sending IPs

IP addresses nacvi.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
77.32.148.22 gu.d.sender-sib.com 2 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
nacvi.comBrevo 2