Moz uses HubSpot for marketing email and Salesforce CRM for transactional/notifications. They rank #2,868 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 2 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to easydmarc.us. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 5 observed emails use a return-path aligned with moz.com (em.moz.com, en.moz.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: 71% of observed emails sign with an aligned DKIM key (em.moz.com, en.moz.com); the rest sign with third-party keys (smtpsendmail.com) where DMARC has to rely on SPF alignment.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: moz.com, em.moz.com, en.moz.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 3 | 75.0% |
| spam | 1 | 25.0% |
Placement observed in Outlook / Microsoft 365 mailboxes. Focused Inbox splits mail into two tabs, "Focused" (inbox) and "Other", plus Junk. 100% landed in Junk across 3 observed Outlook emails.
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | 2 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| Salesforce CRM | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses moz.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 54.174.63.114 | pgg4as.em.moz.com |
4 | Check → |
| 192.40.176.18 | mailer18.gate176.sl.smtp.com |
2 | Check → |
| 54.174.57.167 | unknown |
1 | Check → |
Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
moz.com | HubSpot 5 Salesforce CRM 2 |
