Mn uses Keap for marketing email and Mailgun for transactional/notifications. They rank #10,553 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 77/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 5 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to DMARC Digests. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
DKIM alignment: all 50 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with mn.co (mn.co). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 0% TLS 1.3, 100% TLS 1.2 (across 18 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.
Probed: mn.co, relay-08.mn.co, relay-06.mn.co, relay-05.mn.co, relay-01.mn.co, relay-03.mn.co, relay-04.mn.co, relay-07.mn.co, relay-02.mn.co
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 47 | 95.9% |
| promotions | 2 | 4.1% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keap | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Mailgun | 44 | 95.5% | 4.5% | 0.0% |
Monthly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses mn.co has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.72.47.103 | relay-02.mn.co |
15 | — | Check → |
| 161.38.197.39 | relay-06.mn.co |
8 | — | Check → |
| 161.38.194.53 | relay-08.mn.co |
6 | 1 | Check → |
| 161.38.198.40 | relay-05.mn.co |
6 | — | Check → |
| 69.72.47.104 | relay-03.mn.co |
6 | — | Check → |
| 161.38.198.77 | relay-07.mn.co |
6 | — | Check → |
| 161.38.198.53 | relay-04.mn.co |
5 | 2 | Check → |
| 69.72.35.131 | relay-01.mn.co |
4 | — | Check → |