Microconf uses Drip as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 6 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC enforced with p=reject — receivers actively reject or quarantine spoofed mail. No aggregate reporting destination configured.
SPF alignment: all 46 observed emails use a return-path aligned with microconf.com (drip.microconf.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 40 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with microconf.com (microconf.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 19 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 7 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: microconf.com, drip.microconf.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 38 | 92.7% |
| promotions | 3 | 7.3% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drip | 39 | 92.3% | 7.7% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses microconf.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167.89.40.107 | o2.m.dripemail2.com |
14 | 2 | Check → |
| 168.245.123.156 | o21.sg.m.dripemail2.com |
8 | — | Check → |
| 168.245.95.128 | o31.sg.m.dripemail2.com |
6 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.79.139 | o6.m.dripemail2.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.93.30 | o7.m.dripemail2.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 167.89.79.110 | o4.m.dripemail2.com |
4 | 2 | Check → |
| 168.245.19.191 | o22.sg.m.dripemail2.com |
3 | 2 | Check → |
| 168.245.68.155 | o19.sg.m.dripemail2.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 168.245.71.180 | o23.sg.m.dripemail2.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 168.245.28.80 | o15.sg.m.dripemail2.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 168.245.65.178 | o18.sg.m.dripemail2.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
microconf.com | Drip 49 |